![]() Even the humblest of experience will quickly reveal that the majority of educated women are nothing more than adequate rote learners. Of course, this line of reasoning is false. As such, these men wrongfully assume educated woman possess these qualities for they think it impossible to succeed without them. Intelligent men infer that education can only be obtained if one is rational, analytical, and above all, intellectually curious. Man’s folly lies in his conflation of education with intellectualism. A fast learner is not necessarily a good thinker, one need only look at the Chinese to see emulation rather than innovation women, Chinese or not, are much the same. The fundamentals of intellectualism are necessary only for innovation, not repetition. And yet, via rote memorisation knowledge can be passed on without a more than superficial understanding of it. Who naturally associates education with knowledge bereft of self-awareness, or erudition devoid reason and intellectual curiosity? Aren’t such things the root of all knowledge? Indeed they are. And yet, a common complaint pervades – “these women are well-educated, yet somehow they lack self-awareness and appear dense.” Her level of education deceptively led the man to expect greater intellect, yet in spite of her education, she disappointed the expectation.Īnd so to an intellectual man, the educated woman is a most curious creature. Only in the most fortuitous of circumstances will such an expectation be fulfilled. I’ve known many a man to frequent the company of erudite women, some even more learned than he. If personal experience teaches anything, it is that although men expect educated women to be less vapid than uneducated ones, such expectation yields little but disappointment. And so we must resign ourselves to a most immutable conclusion: education cultivates latent talent, it does not imbue absent talent. The artist may think, but he will never be a philosopher. At its best, education makes philosophers out of thinkers and artists out of drawers. The philosopher may draw, but he will never be an artist. Of course, this notion falls flat on its face when we discover that education does not give the unreasonable, reason, or the unintellectual, intellect. The educated woman is just as vapid as the uneducated, for vapidity is symptomatic of solipsism. Women’s reputation for petty gossip is the most accurate cultural memetic highlighting the vapidity of the feminine.Īnd yet it is oft thought that an educated woman is an intellectual woman, and that by merit of such intellect, such women are not vapid. Women are not even shallow.” – Friedrich NietzscheĢ.) The Hypergamy of Academia at a Glanceģ.) Vapidity, Depth & “Female Intelligence”Įducation neither imbues a woman with reason nor surgically eviscerates her vapidity. “Women are considered deep – why? Because one can never discover any bottom to them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |